Ducky Bhai Alleges Torture and Humiliation in NCCIA Custody: A Comprehensive Account
Pakistani YouTuber Saadur Rehman reveals shocking details of alleged abuse during 100-day detention
Ducky Bhai Introduction
Famous Pakistani YouTuber Saadur Rehman, widely known as Ducky Bhai, has made explosive allegations of torture, humiliation, and financial misconduct during his detention by the National Cyber Crime Investigation Agency (NCCIA). In an emotional hour-long video released on December 7, 2025, the content creator with over 8 million subscribers broke down while recounting his harrowing experience in custody.
The Arrest of Ducky Bhai: How It All Began
On August 17, 2025, Ducky Bhai was arrested at Lahore’s Allama Iqbal International Airport while attempting to travel abroad. The NCCIA detained him on allegations of money laundering and promoting illegal gambling applications through his platform. What followed was over 100 days of custody that Rehman describes as a nightmare of abuse, extortion, and psychological torture.
Timeline of Events:
- August 16, 2025: Ducky Bhai hosts gathering at home, prepares for international travel
- August 17, 2025: Arrested at Lahore Airport by NCCIA
- September 2025: Additional Director Sarfraz Chaudhry dismissed from service
- October 28, 2025: Six NCCIA officers arrested on bribery charges
- November 25, 2025: Ducky Bhai granted bail by Lahore High Court
- November 26, 2025: Released from Camp Jail Lahore
- December 7, 2025: YouTuber breaks 100-day silence with allegations video
Allegations of Physical Abuse and Torture
In his emotional testimony, Ducky Bhai made several serious accusations against NCCIA personnel, particularly targeting Additional Director Sarfraz Chaudhry.
Physical Mistreatment:
According to Rehman’s account, he was subjected to repeated physical violence during interrogation. He alleged being slapped multiple times by officers, with Sarfraz Chaudhry specifically accused of striking his face so many times that he “lost count.” The YouTuber stated he felt “shaken and mentally disturbed” by the treatment.
Verbal Abuse and Humiliation:
Beyond physical torture, Ducky Bhai claimed officers used verbal abuse and humiliation tactics during his detention. He recounted that Chaudhry “stood up from his chair and verbally abused me,” questioning the legitimacy of his income. When Rehman explained his earnings came from his 8 million subscriber YouTube channel, he was accused of “corrupting the minds of children.”
Psychological Warfare:
Perhaps most disturbing was the alleged use of his family as leverage. Rehman claimed officers threatened his wife Aroob Jatoi and elderly mother, showing them beatings via video call. Additionally, he alleged that Chaudhry called a young child on the phone and instructed the child to verbally abuse him, creating intense psychological pressure.
Financial Misconduct Allegations
Beyond the physical and emotional abuse, Ducky Bhai made serious allegations of financial misconduct by NCCIA officials.
Cryptocurrency Account Seizure:
The YouTuber alleged that Investigating Officer (IO) Shoaib Riaz forcibly accessed his Binance account (a cryptocurrency trading platform) and:
- Closed all his active trades and tokens at a loss
- Transferred approximately Rs 9 crore (around $326,000) to his personal account
- Refused to answer when questioned about the transfer
False Court Reports:
Rehman claimed that after the unauthorized transfer came to light, NCCIA officers submitted a false report to the court, claiming they had “recovered” the money from him rather than admitting to the seizure.
Extortion Attempts:
According to the allegations, NCCIA officers demanded bribes from his family:
- Officers allegedly offered to resolve the matter for Rs 70-80 million
- His family borrowed a Rs 6 million loan and transferred it to NCCIA officers
- Officers threatened to file new FIRs against his wife Aroob after confiscating her phone
Officers allegedly boasted about their connections, stating they had ties with judges and could cancel pre-arrest bail applications at will.
Institutional Response and Ongoing Investigation
NCCIA’s Official Statement:
An NCCIA Lahore spokesperson responded to the allegations, stating: “The NCCIA maintains an uncompromising zero-tolerance policy toward any form of corrupt conduct by its officials.” The spokesperson emphasized that “it is individuals who engage in corrupt practices, not institutions” and confirmed that proceedings are being pursued “strictly on merit and in full accordance with due process.”
Officers Arrested of NCCIA :
In October 2025, the FIA Anti-Corruption Circle arrested six NCCIA personnel on charges of misuse of authority and bribery:
- Additional Director Sarfraz Chaudhry
- In-charge Zawar
- Sub-Inspector Ali Raza
- Assistant Director Shoaib Riaz
- Yasir Gujjar
- Mujtaba Kamran
An FIR was registered against nine people, including eight NCCIA personnel, with investigations currently underway based on a complaint filed by Aroob Jatoi.
Intelligence Agencies’ Intervention
In a surprising revelation, Ducky Bhai credited Pakistan’s premier intelligence agencies with intervening in his case. He specifically thanked Field Marshal Asim Munir by name, stating he was “the only name I am going to name.”
The YouTuber revealed meeting a person he called “Big Brother” from the Corps of Military Intelligence, Pakistan Army. He claimed this individual coordinated a covert probe into NCCIA officers and protected his family during his detention.
Ducky Bhai stated: “Thank you to Field Marshal Asim Munir, who saved my family from this corrupt mafia.” He added that “an operation against this corrupt mafia on this scale has never happened in the history of Pakistan, and all credit goes to the intelligence agencies.”
He repeatedly stressed: “Institutions are not bad. Some individuals are.”
Public Reaction and Social Media Response
The release of Ducky Bhai’s video on December 7, 2025, sparked massive public outrage and debate across Pakistani social media:
Key Concerns Raised:
- Abuse of power by law enforcement agencies
- Presumption of guilt before trial
- Lack of oversight in cyber crime investigations
- Protection of digital rights in Pakistan
- Accountability for corrupt officials
Mixed Public Response:
While many sympathized with Ducky’s ordeal, others pointed out his own responsibility. Critics noted that with millions of followers, even casual comments about cryptocurrency gains can encourage inexperienced viewers to invest impulsively in risky ventures.
Netizens are calling for:
- Transparent investigation into abuse allegations
- Systematic reforms in NCCIA procedures
- Protection for content creators and digital entrepreneurs
- Greater accountability for law enforcement
Legal Implications and Due Process
Ducky Bhai’s Legal Status:
The Lahore High Court granted Rehman bail on November 25, 2025, after he provided surety bonds worth Rs 1 million. He was released from Camp Jail on November 26, 2025.
Original Charges:
The FIR against Ducky Bhai includes allegations under:
- Prevention of Electronic Crimes Act, 2016: Sections 13 (Electronic Forgery), 14 (Electronic Fraud), 25 (Spamming), and 26 (Spoofing)
- Pakistan Penal Code: Sections 294-B (Offering prize in connection with trade) and 420 (Cheating and dishonestly inducing delivery of property)
The case stems from an inquiry dated June 13, 2025, based on information that YouTubers and social media influencers were promoting gambling and betting applications for monetary benefits.
Defense Position:
Rehman maintains that his income comes legitimately from his 8 million subscriber YouTube channel and that any cryptocurrency investments were personal and legal. He has issued a public apology, stating: “If my content has had any negative impact, I sincerely apologize to the entire nation.”
Commitment to Legal Process:
In his December 7 video, Ducky Bhai stated: “I will see the legal proceedings to the end, am fully ready to cooperate with the court, and will accept whatever decision the judge makes regarding my case.”
Broader Context: Crypto Regulation in Pakistan
This case highlights the complex intersection of several issues:
Unregulated Crypto Space:
Pakistan lacks comprehensive regulation for cryptocurrency trading, leaving both traders and law enforcement in a gray area. Many Pakistanis trade digital assets without proper oversight or legal framework.
Content Creator Responsibility:
With millions of followers, influencers face questions about their responsibility when discussing investments or financial opportunities. Ducky Bhai’s case has sparked debate about whether casual mentions of trading activities constitute “promotion” of gambling apps.
Law Enforcement Challenges:
Cyber crime investigation requires specialized knowledge and proper procedures. This case exposes potential gaps in:
- Training for digital asset investigations
- Oversight of investigative procedures
- Protection of suspects’ rights during custody
- Handling of seized digital assets
Expert Opinions and Analysis
Legal experts have weighed in on the implications of this case:
Due Process Concerns:
Barrister Mian Ali Ashfaq, representing some of the arrested officers, emphasized that all defendants deserve fair treatment and proper legal representation as the case proceeds.
Institutional Reform Needed:
Analysts suggest this case could be a catalyst for:
- Better training for cyber crime investigators
- Clearer protocols for handling digital assets during investigations
- Stronger oversight mechanisms
- Protection of fundamental rights during custody
- Accountability measures for law enforcement misconduct
Digital Rights Implications:
The case has become a flashpoint for discussions about how Pakistan balances cyber crime enforcement with protecting individual rights in the digital age.
What Happens Next?
Ongoing Investigations:
Two parallel investigations are currently underway:
- FIA Anti-Corruption probe into NCCIA officers’ alleged misconduct
- Original investigation into gambling app promotion allegations against Ducky Bhai
Potential Outcomes:
- Criminal proceedings against accused NCCIA officers
- Resolution of charges against Ducky Bhai through court proceedings
- Possible policy reforms in cyber crime investigation procedures
- Precedent-setting case for digital rights in Pakistan
- Enhanced oversight mechanisms for law enforcement agencies
Ducky Bhai’s Return:
His wife, Aroob Jatoi, has assured fans that Ducky Bhai will return to content creation “stronger than before.” In his December 7 video, he thanked supporters for their messages during his silence and committed to continuing his YouTube career while respecting the ongoing legal process.
Key Takeaways
- Serious allegations of torture, abuse, and financial misconduct made against NCCIA officials
- Multiple officers arrested on bribery and misuse of authority charges
- Intelligence agencies reportedly intervened to protect Rehman and his family
- Public debate intensified around digital rights and law enforcement accountability
- Systemic issues exposed in Pakistan’s approach to crypto regulation and cyber crime
- 100-day silence broken on December 7, 2025, with emotional YouTube testimony
- Legal proceedings ongoing with bail granted but case still active
Conclusion
The Ducky Bhai case represents more than just one YouTuber’s ordeal—it has become a flashpoint for discussions about abuse of power, digital rights, and institutional accountability in Pakistan. As investigations continue into both the alleged misconduct by NCCIA officers and the original charges against Rehman, the case serves as a stark reminder of the challenges facing Pakistan’s digital economy and the need for balanced, rights-respecting law enforcement in the cyber domain.
The outcome of this case could have far-reaching implications for:
- Content creators and influencers
- Law enforcement procedures and training
- Protection of individual rights during investigations
- Cryptocurrency regulation in Pakistan
- Oversight mechanisms for investigative agencies
- Public trust in institutions
With both parallel investigations underway and Ducky Bhai’s commitment to see the legal process through, the coming months will be crucial in determining not just his fate, but potentially setting important precedents for digital rights and law enforcement accountability in an increasingly digital Pakistan.
IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER & INFORMATION NOTE
⚠️ PLEASE READ CAREFULLY:
Source Transparency Notice: This article and all information provided in this post have been collected and compiled from various social media platforms and AI-based sources. The content represents aggregated information from multiple online sources and may include user-generated content, social media posts, news snippets, and AI-processed information.
Purpose of Publication: This article is published for informational and educational purposes only. It is intended to provide readers with a comprehensive overview of publicly available information regarding the subject matter.
Important Advisory:
- This content should be read as reference material only
- DO NOT take any direct action based solely on this article
- DO NOT make legal, financial, or personal decisions based on this information
- DO NOT consider this as verified or official information
- Always cross-reference with official sources and primary authorities
- Seek professional legal, financial, or other expert advice before making any decisions
Limitations:
- Information may be incomplete, outdated, or subject to change
- Sources may contain biases, inaccuracies, or unverified claims
- Social media content can be subjective and may not represent all perspectives
- AI-generated summaries may have limitations in interpretation
Verification Recommendation: For accurate and actionable information, please: ✓ Consult official government sources ✓ Verify with legal authorities ✓ Check primary news outlets ✓ Seek professional consultation ✓ Review court documents and official statements
Reader Responsibility: By reading this article, you acknowledge that the information is provided “as-is” for general awareness only, and you assume full responsibility for how you interpret and use this information.
